Remote Desktop Protocol Vulnerability MS12-020
3 years ago
Originally Published: 2015-09-07
Article Number
000064252
Applies To
Envision 4.x
CVE Identifier(s)
CVE-2012-0152
Operating System
Windows server
Alert Impact
Impacted - Apply Vendor Remedy
Alert Impact Explanation
According to the entry in the vulnerability scanning result for envision server , the patch (Bulletin MS12-020) has not been applied to envision Windows server host. 
Actually we have listed this patch in our monthly enVision OS Updates list when released on March 2012 and suggested customer to apply it: 

RSA enVision OS Updates - Windows 2003 SP1/SP2 Enterprise 64-bit 
https://knowledge.rsasecurity.com/scolcms/set.aspx?id=5353 

https://knowledge.rsasecurity.com/docs/rsa_env/osupdates/2012/win2003-64/Mar2012-win2003-64.htm 
https://knowledge.rsasecurity.com/docs/rsa_env/osupdates/2012/win2008-64/4.1SP1-Win2008-64bit.htm 

Because this issue only impacts on windows system but not enVision appliances thus please take the suggestion in MSFT bulletin. 
You can find the latest download link of that patch from link below , under section “Affected and Non-Affected Software”: 

Microsoft Security Bulletin MS12-020 - Critical 
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms12-020 

Meanwhile, because our envision windows installation image was created on 2011 and a lot of new patches for windows has been related monthly by MSFT since that thus we suggest customer to monitor our RSA OS Updates list over SCOL site and apply these listed patches which has been verified first by RSA in order to keep our server in protected and this operation has been included in envision administrator’s guide (see attachment ) and you can also find the full version from our SCOL site regarding other recommended operations: 

https://knowledge.rsasecurity.com/docs/rsa_env/envision/41sp1/enVision_admin_guide.pdf 
Notes
Since envision only entitles two versions of windows server which are Windows Server 2003 x64 Edition Service Pack 2 and Windows Server 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 so the links should be below:

Windows Server 2003 x64 Edition Service Pack 2 (KB2621440)
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=8081e67f-288c-4714-bff8-e0ff9777692f

Windows Server 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 (KB2621440 and KB2667402)

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=40b62d08-d2a2-4900-b01c-46fc761973d0
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=7ec21f41-1673-4592-b45c-6438ad57e08c

***Update package KB2621440 addresses CVE-2012-0002 and update package KB2667402 addresses CVE-2012-0152. While CVE-2012-0152 has a lower severity rating than KB2621440 on affected versions of Microsoft Windows, the aggregate severity rating is Critical based on CVE-2012-0002. Customers should apply all updates offered for the version of Microsoft Windows installed on their systems.
Disclaimer
Read and use the information in this RSA Security Advisory to assist in avoiding any situation that might arise from the problems described herein. If you have any questions regarding this product alert, contact RSA Software Technical Support at 1- 800 995 5095. RSA Corporation distributes RSA Security Advisories, in order to bring to the attention of users of the affected RSA products, important security information. RSA recommends that all users determine the applicability of this information to their individual situations and take appropriate action. The information set forth herein is provided 'as is' without warranty of any kind. RSA disclaims all warranties, either express or implied, including the warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event, shall RSA or its suppliers, be liable for any damages whatsoever including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, loss of business profits or special damages, even if RSA or its suppliers have been advised of the possibility of such damages. Some states do not allow the exclusion or limitation of liability for consequential or incidental damages, so the foregoing limitation may not apply.

Related Articles

Trending Articles

Don't see what you're looking for?