- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Active Directory as Directory versus Application
When we onboarded Aveksa, the professional services vendor set up Active Directory as an application, rather than as a directory. It's not our source of truth for users, so it hasn't been an issue. But now we're looking to implement Data Access and Governance, and DAG seems to need AD as a directory. Is that correct, or will DAG work with AD as an application? What are the benefits and drawbacks of collecting AD as a diretory versus an application (or both)?
- Tags:
- Community Thread
- Discussion
- Forum Thread
- Identity G&L
- Identity Governance & Lifecycle
- IG&L
- IGL
- RSA Identity
- RSA Identity G&L
- RSA Identity Governance & Lifecycle
- RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle
- RSA IGL
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
The main difference between directories and applications are:
- You can create Identity collectors to get user information from Directories only.
- With a Directory, you can use its collected accounts as accounts for an Application, but you cannot do that using from one Application to another.
I don't think DAG specifically has to do with any of this unless you intend to use one of the above features.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
The main difference between directories and applications are:
- You can create Identity collectors to get user information from Directories only.
- With a Directory, you can use its collected accounts as accounts for an Application, but you cannot do that using from one Application to another.
I don't think DAG specifically has to do with any of this unless you intend to use one of the above features.
