- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Table/View names for direct and indirect relationship for roles
Hello All,
Under User Access tab we see the Direct Entitlements and Indirect Entitlements. In which tables/views we can find the direct and indirect relationship between roles and Entitlements/App roles/Groups ?
- Tags:
- Community Thread
- Discussion
- Forum Thread
- Identity G&L
- Identity Governance & Lifecycle
- IG&L
- IGL
- Reports
- RSA Identity
- RSA Identity G&L
- RSA Identity Governance & Lifecycle
- RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle
- RSA IGL
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
You are right Mostafa. The relation doesn't exist one view/table although this might be possibly a good idea to think of creating a view that contains figures around directs/in-directs.
There are a bunch of tables to be included (group tables/views, explodeduserentitlements tables/views, role tables/views, role model table/views, etc..) in order to get your desired output.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Though I'm not sure, but I don't think the indirect role entitlements are actually stored anywhere. I believe they are calculated when needed (but I could be wrong).
Maybe Ahmed Nofal can help?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
You are right Mostafa. The relation doesn't exist one view/table although this might be possibly a good idea to think of creating a view that contains figures around directs/in-directs.
There are a bunch of tables to be included (group tables/views, explodeduserentitlements tables/views, role tables/views, role model table/views, etc..) in order to get your desired output.
