- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Physical locations of primary and replica instances
Page 118 of the RSA Authentication Manager 8.1 Administrator's Guide shows the following graphic:
I would like to install the Authentication Manager Primary Instance and LDAP Directory Server 1 in the Headquarters building, and the Secondary Instance and LDAP Directory Server 2 in the DR building, physically and geographically separated...then make the above connections.
Does this work? Does it make sense? I'm scared senseless that all of IT will be using a passcode with key fobs, and then AD turns to mush...and we can't get logged in to fix it. I'm hoping the above scenario will fix that?
Thoughts?
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, we're on same page. Normally you want to go local for information requests whenever possible in your network design, so it makes sense for a replica at a separate Replica site to be configured to ask the local replica site Domain Controller for User info, instead of have the same configuration of the Primary. I've seen more than a few sites where copying the Primary configuration to the replica slows things down and causes problems, because the Replica at a different location is configured to first go to the Domain Controller next to the Primary, across a WAN.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks for the PPT, that actually answered some other questions I had.
As for this specific question, it seems we're on the same page:
Correct? Primary instance pointing to local AD/LDAPS with offisite AD/LDAPS as failover, and offsite Replica pointing to offsite AD/LDAPS (that's on the same LAN) with offiste AD/LDAPS as failover.
Primary: onsite. Replica: offsite. Acceptable?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, we're on same page. Normally you want to go local for information requests whenever possible in your network design, so it makes sense for a replica at a separate Replica site to be configured to ask the local replica site Domain Controller for User info, instead of have the same configuration of the Primary. I've seen more than a few sites where copying the Primary configuration to the replica slows things down and causes problems, because the Replica at a different location is configured to first go to the Domain Controller next to the Primary, across a WAN.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks Jay; this gives me confidence to go ahead with my install as planned.
