Hello,
We are creating a role enforcement rule for a few new business roles we created. The roles all follow the same naming convention, and for future scalability we want to avoid having to manually add new roles to these enforcement rules where possible.
With that said, we have been unsuccessful when using wildcards with the role attribute condition. Is there a method that anyone is aware of that would allow us to avoid manually adding roles to these role enforcement rules?
The names of the roles follow the pattern below:
ROLE_%_VA_%
Using a set of selection conditions like the below screenshot, or even a single condition using the string above, fails to identify roles.
I don't see any way to apply the enforcement rule to all roles in a role set either.
We are on 7.1.1 P5
Thanks,
Ryan
Unfortunately this is a limitation in these rules for now. Ideally you would need to use like instead of = for wildcards to work.
I believe what you are asking for is already submitted as an idea here: Advanced filtering option needed for the Role Missing Entitlements Rule type condition selection. I would suggest you vote for that idea to give it visibility.