The parsing of the SMF 30 and Type 80 records in enVision does not seem to line up right. Is there development being done to come up with a more comprehensive RACF reporting component. Some of the reports sorely lack detail; e.g. in the Ad Hoc Reports for IBM Mainframe (RACF) Users or Group Modifications a reason is shown that a userid is being deleted, but the userid that is to be deleted is not shown in the report. This is one of the many shortcomings with regards to the canned RACF reports provided. Is this as good as it gets?