Are there any setbacks for having active members in disabled roles in IMG/Aveksa?
Originally Published: 2015-05-22
Article Number
Applies To
Resolution
Also, the access cannot be revoked through reviews and whatnot, since the access is indirect. You should be able to revoke this access via a regular change request, unless the option is unavailable due to it being indirect. This would not affect any change requests that have already been generated.
Related Articles
Remote collection agents fail after installing JRE/JDK 1.7.0_191+ or 1.8.0_181+ in RSA Identity Governance & Lifecycle Number of Views Listing the contents of the RSA Authentication Manager Java KeyStore (JKS) files Number of Views Unauthorized error when logging in to RSA Authentication Manager Help Desk Admin Portal (HDAP) or Self-Service Portal (SSP… Number of Views Modify the RSA SecurID Access Prime Self-Service Portal (SSP) or Help Desk Admin Portal (HDAP) session timeout value Number of Views Microsoft SharePoint 2016 - WS-Fed SSO Agent Configuration - RSA Ready Implementation Guide Number of Views
Trending Articles
Troubleshooting RSA SecurID Access Identity Router to RSA Authentication Manager test connection failures RSA SecurID Software Token 5.0.2 Downloads for Microsoft Windows RSA Authentication Manager 8.9 Release Notes (January 2026) Quick Setup Guide - Passwordless Authentication in Windows MFA Agent for Active Directory RSA Authentication Manager 8.8 Setup and Configuration Guide
Don't see what you're looking for?
