Are there any setbacks for having active members in disabled roles in IMG/Aveksa?
Originally Published: 2015-05-22
Article Number
Applies To
Resolution
Also, the access cannot be revoked through reviews and whatnot, since the access is indirect. You should be able to revoke this access via a regular change request, unless the option is unavailable due to it being indirect. This would not affect any change requests that have already been generated.
Related Articles
List User Group Membership in Reports Number of Views BEA WebLogic 8.1 xfire.typeMappingRegistry fix Number of Views Error: 'HTTP 500 - Internal Server Error' while performing WebSSO between Asserting Party (AP) and Relying Party (RP) Number of Views FIM error 'Unable to load the keystore from keystore file location' Number of Views Request Could not be Handled while generating server.keystore & client.keystore in RSA Governance & Lifecycle Number of Views
Trending Articles
RSA Authentication Manager Upgrade Process RSA Release Notes for RSA Authentication Manager 8.8 RSA RADIUS Server service failed to start in the RSA Authentication Manager 8.1 Operations Console Microsoft Entra ID External MFA - Relying Party Configuration Using OIDC - RSA Ready Implementation Guide RSA Release Notes: Cloud Access Service and RSA Authenticators
Don't see what you're looking for?
