Are there any setbacks for having active members in disabled roles in IMG/Aveksa?
Originally Published: 2015-05-22
Article Number
Applies To
Resolution
Also, the access cannot be revoked through reviews and whatnot, since the access is indirect. You should be able to revoke this access via a regular change request, unless the option is unavailable due to it being indirect. This would not affect any change requests that have already been generated.
Related Articles
Are there any Macintosh capable browsers supported? Number of Views BEA WebLogic 8.1 xfire.typeMappingRegistry fix Number of Views Error: 'HTTP 500 - Internal Server Error' while performing WebSSO between Asserting Party (AP) and Relying Party (RP) Number of Views List User Group Membership in Reports Number of Views Are there any illegal characters that must not be included in role names? Number of Views
Trending Articles
RSA Authentication Manager 8.9 Setup and Configuration Guide How to 'Trust' the RSA Authentication Manager Security Console Self-Signed Root CA certificate and prevent Cert warnings. RSA Authentication Manager 8.9 Release Notes (January 2026) Configure RSA Authentication Manager as a Secure Proxy Server for Cloud Access Service RSA Authentication Manager Upgrade Process
Don't see what you're looking for?
