Are there any setbacks for having active members in disabled roles in IMG/Aveksa?
Originally Published: 2015-05-22
Last Modified: 2023-10-06
Article Number
Applies To
Resolution
Also, the access cannot be revoked through reviews and whatnot, since the access is indirect. You should be able to revoke this access via a regular change request, unless the option is unavailable due to it being indirect. This would not affect any change requests that have already been generated.
Related Articles
Are there any illegal characters that must not be included in role names? Number of Views After upgrade of the RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle 7.0.1 IBM Tivoli Identity Manager (ITIM) agent to 7.0.1, the ag… Number of Views Are there any Macintosh capable browsers supported? Number of Views RSA Governance & Lifecycle Recipes: Dormant Account Process Number of Views Allowing a non-administrative user to see the monitoring screen IMG: Aveksa Monitoring page Number of Views
Trending Articles
Deploy an Identity Router Virtual Machine in Microsoft Azure How to Replace the Web Server Certificate for the RSA Identity Governance & Lifecycle Web Console How to download the RSA Authentication Manager Console Root Certificate in DER format How to Change the Token Lifetime Extension Window in Authentication Manager Using rsautil AFX Server and Remote Collection Agents fail to start after updating Java to version 1.8u241 (1.8.0_241) / 1.7u251 (1.7.0_…
Don't see what you're looking for?
