Are there any setbacks for having active members in disabled roles in IMG/Aveksa?
Originally Published: 2015-05-22
Last Modified: 2023-10-06
Article Number
Applies To
Resolution
Also, the access cannot be revoked through reviews and whatnot, since the access is indirect. You should be able to revoke this access via a regular change request, unless the option is unavailable due to it being indirect. This would not affect any change requests that have already been generated.
Related Articles
Are there any illegal characters that must not be included in role names? Number of Views Are there any Macintosh capable browsers supported? Number of Views After upgrade of the RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle 7.0.1 IBM Tivoli Identity Manager (ITIM) agent to 7.0.1, the ag… Number of Views RSA Governance & Lifecycle Recipes: Dormant Account Process Number of Views RSA announces the upcoming release of RSA SecurID Access to accelerate and modernize MFA Number of Views
Trending Articles
How to manipulate imported RSA SecurID Software Token(s) on an iPhone or iPad device Reporting on RSA Authentication Manager 8.x users with On-Demand Token, a fixed passcode or a hardware/software token assi… How to Download OTP Token Seed Files from myRSA Anomalix idGenius - SAML Relying Party Configuration - RSA Ready Implementation Guide RSA MFA Agent 2.5 for Microsoft Windows Installation and Administration Guide
Don't see what you're looking for?
