Are there any setbacks for having active members in disabled roles in IMG/Aveksa?
Originally Published: 2015-05-22
Article Number
Applies To
Resolution
Also, the access cannot be revoked through reviews and whatnot, since the access is indirect. You should be able to revoke this access via a regular change request, unless the option is unavailable due to it being indirect. This would not affect any change requests that have already been generated.
Related Articles
Duplicate User IDs Number of Views Authentication Manager Log Messages (26001-26050) Number of Views Remote collection agents fail after installing JRE/JDK 1.7.0_191+ or 1.8.0_181+ in RSA Identity Governance & Lifecycle Number of Views Listing the contents of the RSA Authentication Manager Java KeyStore (JKS) files Number of Views Cloud Access Service Quick Setup Guide for My Page SSO - Step 2: Configure Company Information and Certificates Number of Views
Trending Articles
Passwordless Authentication in Windows MFA Agent for Active Directory – Quick Setup Guide RSA Authentication Manager 8.9 Release Notes (January 2026) RSA Authentication Manager Upgrade Process RSA Authentication Manager 8.7 SP2 Setup and Configuration Guide An example of SSO using SAML and ADFS with RSA Identity Management and Governance 6.9.x
Don't see what you're looking for?
