Are there any setbacks for having active members in disabled roles in IMG/Aveksa?
Originally Published: 2015-05-22
Article Number
Applies To
Resolution
Also, the access cannot be revoked through reviews and whatnot, since the access is indirect. You should be able to revoke this access via a regular change request, unless the option is unavailable due to it being indirect. This would not affect any change requests that have already been generated.
Related Articles
Are there any illegal characters that must not be included in role names? Number of Views Are there any Macintosh capable browsers supported? Number of Views Are there any restrictions to using StealthAUDIT with the RSA Identity Governance & Lifecycle license of StealthAUDIT? Number of Views Is there an alternate "oracle" User ID to manage ACM in RSA IMG? Number of Views Error: 'The server has not found anything matching the Request-URI' in RSA Federated Identity Manager (FIM) Number of Views
Trending Articles
How to manipulate imported RSA SecurID Software Token(s) on an iPhone or iPad device RSA MFA Agent 2.3.6 for Microsoft Windows Installation and Administration Guide RSA MFA Agent 2.5 for Microsoft Windows Installation and Administration Guide RSA Authentication Manager Upgrade Process Running out of disk space when using RMAN in RSA Identity Governance & Lifecycle
Don't see what you're looking for?
