Are there any setbacks for having active members in disabled roles in IMG/Aveksa?
Originally Published: 2015-05-22
Article Number
Applies To
Resolution
Also, the access cannot be revoked through reviews and whatnot, since the access is indirect. You should be able to revoke this access via a regular change request, unless the option is unavailable due to it being indirect. This would not affect any change requests that have already been generated.
Related Articles
List User Group Membership in Reports Number of Views BEA WebLogic 8.1 xfire.typeMappingRegistry fix Number of Views Error: 'HTTP 500 - Internal Server Error' while performing WebSSO between Asserting Party (AP) and Relying Party (RP) Number of Views What is the difference between RSA ACE/Agent 5.x for UNIX and a Communications Server? Number of Views Account summary table export includes the HTML tags that construct the account mapping button in RSA Identity Governance &… Number of Views
Trending Articles
Downloading RSA Authentication Manager license files or RSA Software token seed records RSA MFA Agent 2.3.6 for Microsoft Windows Installation and Administration Guide Quick Setup Guide - Passwordless Authentication in Windows MFA Agent for Active Directory Mandatory Certificate Upgrade Required by 6th October 2025 for RSA MFA Agent for PAM, RSA MFA Agent for Apache, and Third … RSA Authentication Manager 8.9 Release Notes (January 2026)
Don't see what you're looking for?
