Provisioning Termination Rule creating request to revoke groups even though there is already a request from rule to remove same groups in RSA Identity Governance & Lifecycle
Originally Published: 2020-09-22
Article Number
Applies To
RSA Version/Condition: 7.2.0, 7.2.1
Issue
A Provisioning - Termination Rule is generating a request to remove groups from an account even though there is a pending request to Remove the Same groups from the Account.
1. For example, for a Provisioning - Termination Rule that removes Accounts
2. Following Change Request is created by rule for a terminated user to revoke group entitlements.
3. If the Change Request is not completed for some reason and if same user is rehired and then terminated again the rule creates same request as above.
Cause
Resolution
This issue is resolved in the following RSA Identity Governance & Lifecycle patch levels:
- RSA Identity Governance & Lifecycle 7.2.0 P05
- RSA Identity Governance & Lifecycle 7.2.1 P01
Related Articles
Workflow import sometimes does not work even though the result is a success 10Number of Views When cancelling a change request, there is no option to revert completed changes even though completed items exist in RSA … 71Number of Views How to clear open rule violations that are not cleared even though the rule has been deleted in RSA Governance & Lifecycle 74Number of Views Contract expired issue even though the liscense is valid in RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle 59Number of Views RSA Identity Management and Governance Change request item stays in Pending Verification even after successful collection … 333Number of Views
Trending Articles
RSA Authentication Manager 8.9 Setup and Configuration Guide How to 'Trust' the RSA Authentication Manager Security Console Self-Signed Root CA certificate and prevent Cert warnings. RSA Authentication Manager 8.9 Release Notes (January 2026) Configure RSA Authentication Manager as a Secure Proxy Server for Cloud Access Service RSA Authentication Manager Upgrade Process
Don't see what you're looking for?